![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Hi all,
I've received several reports that people have to look at obnoxious ads when reading this blog or posting comments.
I don't see any ads. I don't know if that's a function of me having a paid account or of firefox's foxy ad blocker. However, the idea of me paying $25 a year to host a blog that's serving fullscreen ads to people who look at it just seems wrong.
So please let me know if you see ads and whether you have no account, a free account, or a paid account.
If this is annoying enough people, it might be time to finally move over to wordpress for public posting.
I've received several reports that people have to look at obnoxious ads when reading this blog or posting comments.
I don't see any ads. I don't know if that's a function of me having a paid account or of firefox's foxy ad blocker. However, the idea of me paying $25 a year to host a blog that's serving fullscreen ads to people who look at it just seems wrong.
So please let me know if you see ads and whether you have no account, a free account, or a paid account.
If this is annoying enough people, it might be time to finally move over to wordpress for public posting.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 09:57 pm (UTC)I just hit refresh if an ad comes up, though, and since it's random, it then goes away.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-06 02:36 am (UTC)http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=262
(though that isn't 100% clear for plus accounts)
Paid accounts should not see any ads on LJ, ever, and that's been my experience (aside from when i get logged out).
Wordpress.com will also stick ads on some entries unless you pay extra for no ads.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-08 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:17 pm (UTC)Wordpress has that obnoxious lack of thread tracking, though, forcing comment posters to refer to the sequential comment post number. Really, nested comments have been around for, what, twenty years? Why is this tech not universal?
no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-08 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-09 12:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 11:42 pm (UTC)I also don't like WP for social blogging - it just doesn't work that way. Many of your posts would be ideal for a WP hosted blog. Your projects, travels, adventures, interesting tidbits & research you've done. However, I think you'd find that you would miss the social aspect for some topics where you want a conversation between yourself, your readers and between them. WP just doesn't hack it for that - there's no real concept of a user profile, or linking/friending readers together. It's basically more like a public interaction between you - the blogger, and each reader. (Of course, that doesn't mean some responders don't respond to each other.. it's just much more difficult to track that way).
For me, I'm still working on defining the distinctions of what goes where.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-03 01:19 am (UTC)http://disqus.com/overview/
no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:28 pm (UTC)Why? The only alternatives seem to be removal of free accounts, or your paying more.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-03 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-03 02:50 am (UTC)Ho-Ly-Crap
Date: 2010-10-03 02:58 am (UTC)I couldn't even see his site except as a distant watermark until some freaking ad movie loaded and played. I have a free account and have never bothered to upgrade; I gather these have been discontinued. Really, if that's to be the level of intrusion LJ decides must be the norm, the plus accounts have been made unusable by any reasonable and thinking person.
I share your level of frustration and fear for LJ's continued viability. This sucks.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-03 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-03 10:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-04 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-04 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-06 06:19 pm (UTC)(no ad blockers, no paid account)
I do see ads if I view the journal embedded in another page
no subject
Date: 2010-10-10 07:34 pm (UTC)I only noticed an ad for the first time earlier this year (or maybe last year?) and mentioned it to someone, and then they informed me that unpaid users see ads a lot, and it's been that way for a long time. I'm pretty sure I saw it because I had not logged in and was viewing it from a computer I don't usually use.