mattbell: (Default)
[personal profile] mattbell
Since I last checked a year ago, the price of a thorough (but not complete) genome scan has dropped to around $400, and there's a lot more useful documentation tying it to specific conditions.  There's also the Genetic Nondiscrimination Act, which provides some protection from employer or insurance company discrimination based on genetic conditions.  (I say "some" because they can still discriminate based on diseases caused by genetic defects once any symptom of the disease is present) 

Logically, this seems like a good idea.   If I know more about my risk levels on various preventable diseases (eg heart disease), I can focus my attention on ameliorating the biggest risk factors.  Even if a disease is nonpreventable (eg Huntington's), it will help me better maximize my level of enjoyment of my life by not working my ass off and building up savings for a retirement that's never going to come.

However, I will say that, viscerally speaking, this is scary.  There's a certain dread in finding out a piece of your own fate.  I faced this fear when looking for prior art on things I was looking to patent or when doing STD testing the first couple of times.  This is bigger though -- it's a potential threat to my dreams and plans for my life.  It could also have an impact on marriage, kids etc, plus I could find out things that may be affecting other memebers of my family. 

Of course, logic brain points out that these threats are there whether I look or not.  The one semi-legitimate thing I'd worry about is that by being an early adopter of genetic testing, I could scare off potential mates.  If I have a few known bad genes (and almost everyone does), I might be "scarier" than someone who hasn't had genetic testing. 

Most mainstream people adopt the same "what I don't know can't hurt me" approach with sex and STD testing.  They will gladly have sex with a stranger, no questions asked, but may be scared off by someone who had regular testing and discovered (and cured) some outbreak of an STD years ago.  Fortunately, I'm not so into mainsteam people.

----

Anyway, I'm going to do it.  Most of my fears appear to be of the "head in the sand" variety as opposed to legitimate fears.  But don't ask me if I found anything scary in my genome.  If I want to tell you, I will. 

Date: 2009-09-15 07:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eccentrific.livejournal.com
Relax. It's not going to turn up anything that isn't already in your family history. It's just going to tell you which of those things you actually inherited. I promise you you're not going to discover you have Huntington's disease. :-)

Date: 2009-09-15 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nasu-dengaku.livejournal.com
Good point about Huntingtons. :-)

It's probably a good sign that both my parents are still alive.

Date: 2009-09-16 02:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veleda.livejournal.com
I want to get one of these. after the lsat of course..

Date: 2009-09-16 05:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] easwaran.livejournal.com
I hope you mean the test and not an STD or incurable genetic condition!

Date: 2009-09-16 02:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veleda.livejournal.com
yes the test! ;)

Date: 2009-09-16 05:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] easwaran.livejournal.com
There are some theorems due to economists (Robert Aumann I think?) that show that if information is free, then acquiring more information can only increase your expected return on any future decisions. Of course, this makes the standard rational agent assumptions, where the knowledge itself doesn't change any utilities, and so on.

There are of course some other reasons why you might not want to know though. For instance, having certain knowledge sometimes obligates you to do certain things. I'm not sure whether that sort of consideration could ever be relevant here, but it's at least a possibility.

Date: 2009-09-16 06:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nasu-dengaku.livejournal.com
I think this is one of the few cases where having the knowledge does obligate you to do certain things. If I find out I'm a carrier for certain diseases, I'd be obligated morally to tell anyone I'm starting a family with. Until recently, I would also have been obligated to tell any prospective health insurer, which (if I had any thing bad) would have prevented me from ever getting individual health insurance.

For non-genetic testing, you are still obligated to tell insurance companies when applying for insurance... thus, preventative medicine (eg blood tests, yearly physicals etc) is free and useful information but can lead to catastrophic financial results.

Profile

mattbell: (Default)
mattbell

February 2011

S M T W T F S
   123 45
67 89101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 08:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios